Through Terminating a Cruel Tory Social Experiment, This Budget Definitively Sets Out How Labour Will Fight the Battle to Renew Britain

Just recently, the finance minister, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour economic plan. People have been calling for Labour’s mission and values to be more clearly articulated. Through the choices made – a shift to a more equitable tax system, targeting wealth to fund tackling child poverty, quality public services and the living expenses – we have unequivocally set out what we stand for.

This is why Labour MPs applauded in the Commons, and it’s why we are up for the fights to come. And it’s why the protests from the right began right away.

The Main Political Divide in British Politics

The central division in British politics is once again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who aim to reform it so it benefits everyday working people, and on the other, our political opponents, who support the current system and the failed doctrine of the past. We must now confront, and win, the debate.

The Tories had 14 years to resolve things and in reality, by any measure, they got much worse. Their doctrinaire austerity and supply-side economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, cutting off investment (leaving us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people post-Covid – didn’t work.

Record of Failure Under the Former Government

Quality of life dropped by the largest margin since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest they’ve ever been, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis took hold, young people affected by Covid were abandoned. The record of failure continues.

One budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for renewal and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the argument for why our strategy will yield benefits.

Welfare Spending and Child Poverty

Under the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they failed to tackle the root causes: low pay, high housing costs, deep inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to manage the effects instead of the solution.

It’s why we are building more affordable homes than for a generation, increasing wages and enhanced protections for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.

Removing the Two-Child Benefit Cap

This is also the reason we are absolutely right to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.

For almost a decade, since it was enacted, low-income families with children have suffered from a cruel social experiment that was marketed as fair for working people when it was the opposite. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.

It has only served to push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being heartless and unethical.

Real Impact in Local Areas

From experience from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be lifted out of poverty as a result of abolishing the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in overcrowded, damp homes, parents during the holidays depending on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.

I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already stretched but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the results of deep poverty.

Long-Term Effects of Child Poverty

Just one in four pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with nearly three in four among wealthier families. This sets them up for the challenges they face during their lives: unrealized potential, financial struggles and poor health. Children who were raised in poverty are more likely to be unemployed or poor as adults.

Addressing child poverty isn’t just a ethical duty, it is a future-oriented strategy. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the £3bn cost of removing the two-child cap, or expanding free school meals.

That’s why we acted promptly in the budget, despite the challenging economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred additional children pushed into poverty. The effects of lifting it will not occur overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was crucial.

The cap was a totem to 14 years of unsuccessful conservative ideology. Now it is gone.

Equitable Financing for Policies

We, as Labour, can also be clear that these measures are being funded in a fair way – from a new gambling levy, eliminating tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.

Conclusion

Equity and purpose – that’s how we will win the contest of ideas. This budget is a definitive statement that we won the election as Labour, and will lead as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political platform and set the agenda more strongly about what’s really wrong with the country and how we are repairing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.

So let’s maintain it and prevail in this fight about how we will rebuild Britain and tackle the deep inequalities holding us back.

Paul Vega
Paul Vega

Elara is a financial strategist with over a decade of experience in legacy and estate planning, helping families secure their futures.