🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."